Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Anyone see anything wrong with this particular NFPA 14 standpipe layout? 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

SprinklerDesigner2

Mechanical
Nov 30, 2006
1,251
Georgia has some peculiar rules on standpipes with the 2003 edition currently adopted with a few changed that can be found here

120-3-3 State Minimum Fire Safety Standards - effective 03-09-2010

The change that affects me is found on Page 31:

(b) Modification to Chapter 7:

1. Delete 7.8.1.1 in its entirety and substitute in its place the following:

“7.8.1.1 Hydraulically designed standpipe systems shall be designed to provide the waterflow rate required by Section 7.10 at a minimum residual pressure of 100 psi (6.9 bar) at the outlet of the hydraulically most remote 2-1/2 inch (65 mm) hose connection and 65 psi (4.5 bar) at the outlet of the hydraulically most remote 1-1/2 (38 mm) hose station.

Exception No. 1: Where the local Fire Chief or local Fire Code Official having fire suppression jurisdiction permits lower than 100 psi (6.9 bar) for 2-1/2 inch (65 mm) hose connections, based upon local suppression tactics, the pressure shall be permitted to be reduced to not less than 65 psi (4.5 bar).

Exception No. 2: Where the building is protected throughout by a supervised automatic sprinkler system and the building is not a high-rise, as defined in 3.3.9, the minimum residual pressure provisions shall not be mandatory when the standpipe system piping is a minimum of eight inches (8”) nominal diameter.

Exception No. 3: Existing high-rise buildings, as defined in 3.3.9, that are protected throughout by a supervised automatic sprinkler system shall be permitted a reduction of the minimum residual pressure requirement of 100 psi (6.9 bar) at the hydraulically most remote 2-1/2 inch (63.5 mm) hose connection to
65 psi (4.5 bar).”

So the way I read it as long as everything is 8" it sort of reverts to something similar to a manual standpipe system which are not allowed in Georgia except parking garages. Of course it isn't a manual standpipe system but without having to have a residual pressure requirement (the way i read it all we need is 2 lbs on top and we're good to go) it's sort of like a manual standpipe.

Tomorrow I am going to conduct a flow test but past experience in this area tells me to expect a static pressure of 65 psi and a residual pressure of around 40 flowing 1,000 gpm so by adding some heads, watching my head spacing and increasing pipe size I'm sure the sprinkler will be just fine given the fourth floor sprinklers are 50' (22 psi) above grade. This is the swamp area of Georgia and everything is exceedingly flat.

I really need to avoid a fire pump for two reasons.

First one is found in the State Minimum Safety Standards on page 33:

(18) NFPA 20, 2003 Edition, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Pumps for Fire Protection
Modifications:

(a) Modification to Chapter 2:

1. Add a new paragraph 2-1.1.1 to read as follows:
“2-1.1.1 At 150% rated capacity or below, the pump suction supply shall not drop below 20 psi (1.38 bar).

Exception: Suction supply pressure may be lowered upon approval of the authority having jurisdiction.”

In the for what it is worth department the local people will not budge and there is also a regulation by the Georgia EPA that mandates a 20 psi suction pressure which specifically mentions "fire pumps" and there is no exceptions to the EPA regulation.

In this jurisdiction full flow meters and backflow assemblies are required and if the system has a fire pump, or a private fire hydrant, the backflow assembly must be an RPZ.

An 8" Ames 4000ss develops a head loss exceeding 10 psi when flowing and experience has shown me the manufactures lie. Maybe the assembly tested in the factory might be 10.3 psi but I don't care what their chart says whenever I have actually tested one, run a pump test putting a gauge at both the suction and discharge port of the assembly, my real loss has always been closer to 14 or 15 psi.

Then there is the tapping valve and sleeve. Anyone who believes an 8" tapping valve and sleeve carries the same equivalent fitting loss a standard MJ tee develops hasn't been around all that long. Rather than the 59' (C=150) Table 14.4.3.1.1 calls for I'll bet anyone here it's closer to 300'. What else to expect when the 8" tapping coupon measures 7" across?

Having that residual pressure drop below 20 psi during the pump acceptance test, usually one week before the grand opening, scares me to death because there is no easy way out.

The building is wood with composite floor joists so running 8" overhead won't work and I can see any structural engineer having a cow if I broached the subject.

So why not run the 8" underground outside the building as shown on the attached drawing?

I've run 8" before to avoid a pump but hanging inside wasn't a problem but something has me spooked on the underground layout. I am pretty darn sure it is fine but before I proceed, before I tell the owner it is possible only to have egg end up on my face, I'm sure everyone here understands that I need to 100% sure it's correct.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Is interconnection still required??

Eight inch pipe in the stairwell seems a lot!!
 
cdafd said:
Is interconnection still required??

Yes, and it is interconnected. What is the difference between running it outside like I did and running inside the "normal" way?

cdafd said:
Eight inch pipe in the stairwell seems a lot!!

I agree but to avoid a fire pump it says 8" which means the stairwell pipe.
 
SD2

I agree with your analysis. Minus delta P for the BFP and tapping sleeve, your design literally brings the municipal water supply into the building. What's disheartening is that this is most likely a Type VA R-2 occcupancy and it's protected with a NFPA 13R sprinkler system. That's a lot of extra diameter not really needed.

Here in my town, we allow Class I manual dry standpipe on these buildings. We're dispatching 4 Engines & 2 Ladders on a commercial building fire assignment and the 3rd arriving Engine is responsible for water supply to the other engine and FDC. So in the buildings were currently reviewing, a 2.5 inch sprinkler riser and a 4 inch dry standpipe are in the same vertical exit enclosure (stair shaft).

 
GA does not allow manual standpipes? That is strange. I just completed a residential project in Cobb County, GA. I had to fill out the standpipe plan review checklist. It specifically asks the type of standpipe system: Manual Wet? Manual Dry? Automatic Wet? Automatic Dry? It seems odd that Cobb County would accept that, but the State of GA does not? As strange as it seems, Cobb County has not wanted calcs for the manual dry (but I always do them), and they want calcs for the Manual Wet. The Manual calcs are based on the FDC supply.

Travis Mack
MFP Design, LLC
 
Travis,

All I know is what I read in the modifications to Chapter 7 which Cobb County is obligated to follow.

You can be sure at the next meeting of the Georgia Fire Sprinkler Association I will definitely bring this up.

 
It is interesting how people interpret things differently. In looking at this, I don't see where it precludes you from installing a manual standpipe system. It just says that you have to calculate the system you have to provide 100 psi at the remote connection. This would be correct with a manual or automatic standpipe. Just with the manual, you calc to the FDC.

Travis Mack
MFP Design, LLC
 
Travis,

I will look some more but fire pumps are galore on four story motels all over Georgia but I have seen where the crowd has been wrong before.

 
That is interesting, Travis. Cobb County FM is pretty good about knowing their stuff when it comes to sprinklers and standpipes. Usually, they want calcs on EVERYTHING other than minor tenant modifications
 
bmlxd40,

I know you are in Cobb County and what has been your experience with manual standpipes?
 
Yeah. Cobb County has been great to work with from a plan review perspective. They are pretty straightforward on what they want and what they expect. I prefer that over some AHJ's who demand different things depending on the day of the week.

Travis Mack
MFP Design, LLC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor