cornemo
Mechanical
- Apr 23, 2009
- 55
Dear,
in API650 appendix P all formulas refer to t, which is the shell thickness at the opening connection.
To calculate the stiffness of the connection, the code differentiates between nozzles with reinforcement on shell (figures P.2a to P.2f) or reinforcement in the nozzle neck (figures P.2g to P.2l).
For the verification of the nozzle loads figures P.4a and P.4b are given. Here no differentiation is made regarding reinforcement.
Does the code automatically consider reinforcement in these figures and does it assume the allowable loads are the same for both types of reinforcement?
Or do we have to use the thickness of the shell+reinforcement instead of the thickness of the shell only to get the Y-factors from figures P.4a and P.4b?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
in API650 appendix P all formulas refer to t, which is the shell thickness at the opening connection.
To calculate the stiffness of the connection, the code differentiates between nozzles with reinforcement on shell (figures P.2a to P.2f) or reinforcement in the nozzle neck (figures P.2g to P.2l).
For the verification of the nozzle loads figures P.4a and P.4b are given. Here no differentiation is made regarding reinforcement.
Does the code automatically consider reinforcement in these figures and does it assume the allowable loads are the same for both types of reinforcement?
Or do we have to use the thickness of the shell+reinforcement instead of the thickness of the shell only to get the Y-factors from figures P.4a and P.4b?
Thanks in advance for your reply.