Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ASCE 7-16: Ch13 vs. Ch15 Loading Requirements

structeng2

Structural
Apr 18, 2016
32
Hello All -

I am interested to see how other folks approach nonstructural component support design when the support system is more analogous to a structural system than a component.

Consider a 500lb sheet metal box transformer (ap = 1.0; Rp = 2.5), and the following two cases:
  1. A sheet metal box transformer mounted directly to a grade-level concrete slab.
    • This is pretty clearly just a chapter 13 calculation (using Fp force).
  2. The same sheet metal box is mounted on top of a 2-foot tall HSS frame (total frame weight = 250lb) with diagonal bracing similar to an OCBF, which is anchored to a grade-level concrete slab.
    • ASCE 7-16 13.6.4 would seem to indicate that both the attachment of the transformer to the HSS frame and the design of the HSS frame itself should be done using the Fp forces per Ch13.
    • ASCE 7-16 13.1.1 says that if the nonstructural component weighs > 25% of the structure, then it should be designed per ch15. (This assumes you can call the hss frame a 'structure').
How would you approach case #2?

Using Fp to design what is essentially an OCBF doesn't seem accurate since you are using seismic response factors for a sheet metal box to determine lateral forces on a braced frame. And designing the entire thing per ch15 seems to not accurately capture the response and force demands of the transformer onto the support frame.

Thanks for your input!

ref 13.1.1
13.1.1.JPG

ref13.6.4
13.6.4.JPG
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

How would you approach case #2?

Using Fp to design what is essentially an OCBF doesn't seem accurate since you are using seismic response factors for a sheet metal box to determine lateral forces on a braced frame. And designing the entire thing per ch15 seems to not accurately capture the response and force demands of the transformer onto the support frame.

-Still my approach would be similar to case #1 assuming the component operating weight Wp would be total wt ( 750 lb ) and use expression (13.3-1)
- Although the dimensions are not stated , sheet metal box transformer together with supporting structure could be assumed rigid and clause 15.4.2 Rigid Nonbuilding Structures could be followed.
- Nonbuilding structures that have a fundamental period, T, less than 0.06 s, including their anchorages, shall be designed for the lateral force obtained
from the following:
V =0.30*SDS*W*Ie
- Notice that this expression (15.4-5) is similar to (13.3-3) Fp =0.3*SDS*Ip*Wp which is lower bound value ,
- Sharpening the pencil and performing refined period calculation ( 15.3.2 ) eventually would not effect the practical size of anchors .
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor