ldffernandes
Mechanical
- Oct 14, 2015
- 7
Hello,
If a pressure vessel is to be designed by analysis and if the designer intends to validate the dimensions/geometry of the welded joints he specified without resorting to Part 4 for welded joint details, what steps should the designer take in order to analyse the weld joint?
For instance lets think of a "very simple" circular pressure vessel with flat faces on both ends and a category B type 2 circumferential weld joint on the main shell.
Perhaps the answers to the above questions will allude to a sensitivity analysis, but I am curious about your opinion.
If a pressure vessel is to be designed by analysis and if the designer intends to validate the dimensions/geometry of the welded joints he specified without resorting to Part 4 for welded joint details, what steps should the designer take in order to analyse the weld joint?
For instance lets think of a "very simple" circular pressure vessel with flat faces on both ends and a category B type 2 circumferential weld joint on the main shell.
- What toe blend angle should the designer use for analysis?
- Should the designer define the weld face as an arc? Or perhaps some other more complex geometry like a spline?
- Can the designer apply small radius fillets to the weld toes as to avoid stress singularities?
Perhaps the answers to the above questions will allude to a sensitivity analysis, but I am curious about your opinion.