Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ASME Sec. IX HFO

Status
Not open for further replies.

jrtei

Materials
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
20
Location
US
I have a HFO scenario where P1 base metal may need to have weld buildup with either E7018, ER70S-6 (GTAW), or ER70S-6 (GMAW). After the buildup it would have a butter layer with either ER309 (GTAW) or ER309-16. Then to finish it would have either ECoCr-E or ERCoCr-E (GTAW) for the hard facing. Would the following avenue of qualification be the most direct (least extensive), and would it be legitimate?

- 1-1/2" thick P1 CJP groove weld PQR with .300" of E7018, .300" of ER70S-6 (GTAW), .300" of ER70S-6 (GMAW), .300" of ER309 (GTAW), and .300" of E309-16. This qualifies weld buildup/buttering of up to .600" of each filler metal on unlimited P1 base metal thickness. I am thinking this would cover my CS buildup followed by SS buttering in one shot.
- 1" thick HFO PQR on P8 base metal with ECoCr-E (in accordance with QW-216.5). Qualifies my HFO procedure on base metal from 1" thick to unlimited.
- 1" thick HFO PQR on P8 base metal with ERCoCr-E (GTAW) (in accordance with QW-216.5). Qualifies my HFO procedure on base metal from 1" thick to unlimited.

Does this make sense? If not how would you qualify this scenario with the least PQR's required?
 
Hard-Facing Overlay. See for example table QW-253.1.

Huub
- You never get what you expect, you only get what you inspect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top