Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ASME section 1, table PW-11, interpretation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Roger00

Mechanical
Apr 9, 2008
18
Hi All,

please share your opinion. can UT replace RT for tubes subject to furnace radiant heat with diameter below NPS 4 (DN 100) and thickness below 0.5 in. (13 mm). ASME Section I, 2011, table PW-11, general notes (g), requires thickness below 0.5 in shall be RT, while in the table for tubes requires volumetric examination if OD above NPS 4 and thickness above 0.5 in. I have read code case 2235, year 2005, UT can replace RT for thickness at 13 mm and greater.

second question, If tubes has OD below NPS 4 and thickness is below 0.5 in, is volumetric inspection required?

Thanks...
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

No, volumetric examination is not required for circumferential welds in boiler tubing based on Table PW-11. If it is invoked by a client or owner/user it is because of workmanship and not a code requirement. Use of UT versus RT for workmanship is based on contractual agreement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor