theCorkster
Geotechnical
- Sep 2, 2005
- 146
I'm working on a project in California and have designed the AC pavement sections using the Caltrans method. I've also calculated the structure sections using the AASHTO methodology. In order to design the AASHTO sections, I've used the empirical relationship recommended by AASHTO to convert resistance value to resilient modulus. Overall, the AASHTO method produces comparable to slight thicker AC sections, but yields significantly thinner baserock sections.
The AASTHO method pavement section thickness is slightly affected by using a low value of the drainage coefficient, m. However, I've also read that it's not really appropriate to use a low value for m (say 0.4) for poor drainage conditions, as compared to using a value of 1.0 for average drainage conditions.
I know that the Caltrans resistance value used in the design represents a saturated condition, and therefore the worst-case condition. However, the AASHTO baserock section varies as much as 75 percent less than the Caltrans section.
Any similar experiences between the two design methods?
Does anyone know if AASHTO recommend a minimum baserock section regardless of calculation, and if so, what is that thickness?
Also, does AASHTO recommend using a geosynthetic separation fabric between the base and soil subgrade?
Thanks
The AASTHO method pavement section thickness is slightly affected by using a low value of the drainage coefficient, m. However, I've also read that it's not really appropriate to use a low value for m (say 0.4) for poor drainage conditions, as compared to using a value of 1.0 for average drainage conditions.
I know that the Caltrans resistance value used in the design represents a saturated condition, and therefore the worst-case condition. However, the AASHTO baserock section varies as much as 75 percent less than the Caltrans section.
Any similar experiences between the two design methods?
Does anyone know if AASHTO recommend a minimum baserock section regardless of calculation, and if so, what is that thickness?
Also, does AASHTO recommend using a geosynthetic separation fabric between the base and soil subgrade?
Thanks