Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ASTM E8

Status
Not open for further replies.

CCross

Aerospace
Nov 4, 2010
2
ASTM E8, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, Paragraph 6.6.2.1, Full Cross Section, states that For material not exceeding 5mm in diameter...the cross-sectional area may be reduced to not less than 90% of the original area without changing the shape of the cross section.

I am looking for some clarification on this paragraph. Does this paragraph intended to convey that if a test specimens cross sectional area is reduced to not less than 90% of the original area, no matter what the resulting shape is, that it can be assumed that the original area has not changed; or does this mean that while reducing the cross sectional area to not less than 90% you can also not change the shaped of the specimen?

Thanks for your input!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

It means the latter-- round cross-sections stay round after machining/sanding/etc. The cross-section should be measured after this procedure so that you have the correct value for calculation of strength.
 
So is there any standard for say run out when a circular sample is reduced in order to ensure that the round sample stayed round? I do not believe that someone with sand paper will be able to perfectly, within say .0001 or less of an inch, reduce a round sample diameter, but the ASTM does state that abrasive cloth or paper can be used so I would imagine their intent was to allow for "hand" reduction of the sample.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor