pelelo
Geotechnical
- Aug 10, 2009
- 357
Engineers,
I have few questions about the "Average Degree of Consolidation, U(%)", provided by NAVFAC DM 7.01 (See attached).
1 - We all know that if a clay layer is between to pervious layers (e.g sands) then there is a two way drainage path (H/2). On the other hand, if clay layer is between a Impervious material at the bottom (e.g rock) and a pervious one on top (sand), then the drainage path is only one way, therefore H = H.
My question is, if there is a situation in which I have a clay layer with a sand layer (Pervious) at the bottom and on top is just the surface, do you consider that as a 2 way drainage condition?. My understanding is it is, as flow tends to travel towards the surface.
2 - Per the plot attached, the there are alpha values for conditions when you have 2 way drainage and 1 way drainage. For the 1 way drainage the plot presents 2 boundaries of alpha values, an upper (alpha =0) and a lower (alpha=infinite). How do know which one is the appropriate one to use?
3 - If my strata is (from top to bottom):
Sand (0 - 10 ft)
Clay #1 (10- 25 ft)
Sand/Gravel (25-35 ft)
Clay #2 (35 - 45 ft)
BEDROCK (At 45 ft)
I am required to compute the time after reaching 25% of settlement on both clay layers after construction, do you understand that for this strata there are going to be different alpha values in order to compute the time factor T or (Tv)?
Clay #1 is double drained, therefore i would use the plot that corresponds to alpha =1.
On other hand, Clay #2 is single drained, therefore i will need to use either alpha =infinite or alpha =0. Do you agree?
4 - Under which conditions do i know when to use alpha =5 and alpha = 0.5 curves?
Thanks
I have few questions about the "Average Degree of Consolidation, U(%)", provided by NAVFAC DM 7.01 (See attached).
1 - We all know that if a clay layer is between to pervious layers (e.g sands) then there is a two way drainage path (H/2). On the other hand, if clay layer is between a Impervious material at the bottom (e.g rock) and a pervious one on top (sand), then the drainage path is only one way, therefore H = H.
My question is, if there is a situation in which I have a clay layer with a sand layer (Pervious) at the bottom and on top is just the surface, do you consider that as a 2 way drainage condition?. My understanding is it is, as flow tends to travel towards the surface.
2 - Per the plot attached, the there are alpha values for conditions when you have 2 way drainage and 1 way drainage. For the 1 way drainage the plot presents 2 boundaries of alpha values, an upper (alpha =0) and a lower (alpha=infinite). How do know which one is the appropriate one to use?
3 - If my strata is (from top to bottom):
Sand (0 - 10 ft)
Clay #1 (10- 25 ft)
Sand/Gravel (25-35 ft)
Clay #2 (35 - 45 ft)
BEDROCK (At 45 ft)
I am required to compute the time after reaching 25% of settlement on both clay layers after construction, do you understand that for this strata there are going to be different alpha values in order to compute the time factor T or (Tv)?
Clay #1 is double drained, therefore i would use the plot that corresponds to alpha =1.
On other hand, Clay #2 is single drained, therefore i will need to use either alpha =infinite or alpha =0. Do you agree?
4 - Under which conditions do i know when to use alpha =5 and alpha = 0.5 curves?
Thanks