idesign73
Mechanical
- Sep 25, 2002
- 28
Hi all.
My company makes liquid level gages for boiler trim applications. I am working on pipe bends that join two gage sections together. Our current product (designed WAY before my time)has the radius of the bend at 1 5/8" (NPS 3/4 Sch. 160 SA-106 Gr. B pipe)which, according to our testing, results in a wall thickness below 12.5% under nominal thickness. It was just recently that I noticed the Addenda to B31.1 which includes an alternate way of calculating the minimum wall thickness (Equations 3B-3D of B31.1 102.4.5). What I am trying to do is work backwards from the equations. For the value of "tm" I am inserting the minimum allowable wall thickness (12.5% under nominal wall thickness), solving for "I". I then insert that value of "I" into Equation 3D or 3E and attmept to solve for "R", hence giving me the radius that would be acceptable with our material, OD and ID. However, the value I obtain for "R" comes out negative for the extrados. This does not make any sense to me.
According to our testing, the smallest radius we can bend and maintain a wall thickness greater than 12.5% under nominal is 2 3/8" with 3/4 Sch. 160 SA-106 Gr. B steel. However, the old design, as I said is at a 1 5/8" radius with no problems reported from the field (given at least a 40 year history).
Can anyone comment on what I am seeing here? Am I using the equations incorrectly? Is there anything in Code that would explain why the 1 5/8" radius is ok? I have some test parts on order so that I can measure the wall thickness at the bend. I will then attempt to do a hoop strength calculation and see what I am getting for a safety factor with that wall thickness.
Any comments or suggestions are most appreciated.
My company makes liquid level gages for boiler trim applications. I am working on pipe bends that join two gage sections together. Our current product (designed WAY before my time)has the radius of the bend at 1 5/8" (NPS 3/4 Sch. 160 SA-106 Gr. B pipe)which, according to our testing, results in a wall thickness below 12.5% under nominal thickness. It was just recently that I noticed the Addenda to B31.1 which includes an alternate way of calculating the minimum wall thickness (Equations 3B-3D of B31.1 102.4.5). What I am trying to do is work backwards from the equations. For the value of "tm" I am inserting the minimum allowable wall thickness (12.5% under nominal wall thickness), solving for "I". I then insert that value of "I" into Equation 3D or 3E and attmept to solve for "R", hence giving me the radius that would be acceptable with our material, OD and ID. However, the value I obtain for "R" comes out negative for the extrados. This does not make any sense to me.
According to our testing, the smallest radius we can bend and maintain a wall thickness greater than 12.5% under nominal is 2 3/8" with 3/4 Sch. 160 SA-106 Gr. B steel. However, the old design, as I said is at a 1 5/8" radius with no problems reported from the field (given at least a 40 year history).
Can anyone comment on what I am seeing here? Am I using the equations incorrectly? Is there anything in Code that would explain why the 1 5/8" radius is ok? I have some test parts on order so that I can measure the wall thickness at the bend. I will then attempt to do a hoop strength calculation and see what I am getting for a safety factor with that wall thickness.
Any comments or suggestions are most appreciated.