electricpete
Electrical
- May 4, 2001
- 16,774
We purchased and just installed a new 3000 HP 1200 HP vertical motor for a centrifugal pump application.
The upper bearing is a Renk EVEKU-011. The thrust element of this bearing is tilted pad and the raidal element of this bearing is sleeve. Bearing is immersed in a 55 gallon oil reservoir. Oil reservoir has cooling coils specified by motor OEM to supply 28gpm cooling water. We are supplying on-site 40gpm of cooling water at around 73F (expect that the cooling water supply temperature may increase up to 95F in the summer).
Here are our temperature results with readdings identified as
"UG" = Upper Guide (radial sleeve bearing), "TH" = Thrust tilted pad bearing
In the factory, Motor had run w/o thrust load with 28gpm water in the neighborhood 60F-70F and after several hours they recorded stabilized temperatures
UG=183F, TH = 156F
All vibration readings < 0.08 ips (rms pk/0).
On our site, Ran motor uncoupled approx 1 hour and then read temperatures:
UG = 187F, TH = 155F (seems reasonably close to factory results).
All vibration readings < 0.03 ips (rms pk/0).
Verified oil viscosity and level per OEM specs. Electrical checks on thermocouple circuits ok.
Secured motor., Coupled motor (took several hours).
Restarted motor coupled.
~ 1 hr after start UG=189F, TH = 164F
~ 3.5 hr after start UG = 193F, TH = 162F appears stable.
We don't have a communication channel to Renk and very sparse documentation.
Motor OEM tells us some info:
The UG is expected to run higher than the TH because the oil flow in this bearing flow through thrust first where it is heated and then through UG where it is heated further. We don't have experience with this type and I'm just curious if anyone has seen this same pattern UG higher temp than thrust on Renk bearings in vertical motor?
Motor OEM had provided the following limits:
194F (90C) = Alarm temperature per motor OEM
203F (95C) = Shutdown temperature per motor OEM
Obviously when our water temp goes up by 20F or more we will have some problems meeting these alarm limits.. The motor OEM is re-evaluating the limits. I would like to be able to understand and evaluate them somewhat independently.
*********My questions: ***********
Similar limits (90C alarm and 100C shutdown) seem pretty common in the literature but I don't really understand the basis..can someone explain the basis for these lmits?.
What kind of dangers are faced if we were to operate the motor continuously for months or years with UG at 90C, 95C, 100C, or even 105C? Melting point of modern tin babbit grades is much higher. It seems bearing will be relatively uniform temperature (considering there is not much load zone in well-aligned a vertical machine.)
Is the reason for the margin between trip limit and melting point to allow for uncertainty of measurement (we're not seeing the hottest spot). Or are there some considerations other than melting which limit the temperature?
Does anyone know how close to the bearing working surface is temperature sensed in these bearings? How much hotter would we expect hottest spot compared to our sensed temperature in this UG configuration?
Do these readings sound typical to you for Renk bearings? UG 25-30 more than TH?
Considering in most cases hot bearings are heavily loaded and in this case the hot bearings are almost unloaded (UG), are the same temperature restrictions applicable to lightly loaded bearings as heavily loaded bearings?
Does anyone have any resource for Renk bearings other than Does anyone have contact info for Renk technical support accessible to end users?
Thx in advance.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
The upper bearing is a Renk EVEKU-011. The thrust element of this bearing is tilted pad and the raidal element of this bearing is sleeve. Bearing is immersed in a 55 gallon oil reservoir. Oil reservoir has cooling coils specified by motor OEM to supply 28gpm cooling water. We are supplying on-site 40gpm of cooling water at around 73F (expect that the cooling water supply temperature may increase up to 95F in the summer).
Here are our temperature results with readdings identified as
"UG" = Upper Guide (radial sleeve bearing), "TH" = Thrust tilted pad bearing
In the factory, Motor had run w/o thrust load with 28gpm water in the neighborhood 60F-70F and after several hours they recorded stabilized temperatures
UG=183F, TH = 156F
All vibration readings < 0.08 ips (rms pk/0).
On our site, Ran motor uncoupled approx 1 hour and then read temperatures:
UG = 187F, TH = 155F (seems reasonably close to factory results).
All vibration readings < 0.03 ips (rms pk/0).
Verified oil viscosity and level per OEM specs. Electrical checks on thermocouple circuits ok.
Secured motor., Coupled motor (took several hours).
Restarted motor coupled.
~ 1 hr after start UG=189F, TH = 164F
~ 3.5 hr after start UG = 193F, TH = 162F appears stable.
We don't have a communication channel to Renk and very sparse documentation.
Motor OEM tells us some info:
The UG is expected to run higher than the TH because the oil flow in this bearing flow through thrust first where it is heated and then through UG where it is heated further. We don't have experience with this type and I'm just curious if anyone has seen this same pattern UG higher temp than thrust on Renk bearings in vertical motor?
Motor OEM had provided the following limits:
194F (90C) = Alarm temperature per motor OEM
203F (95C) = Shutdown temperature per motor OEM
Obviously when our water temp goes up by 20F or more we will have some problems meeting these alarm limits.. The motor OEM is re-evaluating the limits. I would like to be able to understand and evaluate them somewhat independently.
*********My questions: ***********
Similar limits (90C alarm and 100C shutdown) seem pretty common in the literature but I don't really understand the basis..can someone explain the basis for these lmits?.
What kind of dangers are faced if we were to operate the motor continuously for months or years with UG at 90C, 95C, 100C, or even 105C? Melting point of modern tin babbit grades is much higher. It seems bearing will be relatively uniform temperature (considering there is not much load zone in well-aligned a vertical machine.)
Is the reason for the margin between trip limit and melting point to allow for uncertainty of measurement (we're not seeing the hottest spot). Or are there some considerations other than melting which limit the temperature?
Does anyone know how close to the bearing working surface is temperature sensed in these bearings? How much hotter would we expect hottest spot compared to our sensed temperature in this UG configuration?
Do these readings sound typical to you for Renk bearings? UG 25-30 more than TH?
Considering in most cases hot bearings are heavily loaded and in this case the hot bearings are almost unloaded (UG), are the same temperature restrictions applicable to lightly loaded bearings as heavily loaded bearings?
Does anyone have any resource for Renk bearings other than Does anyone have contact info for Renk technical support accessible to end users?
Thx in advance.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.