Since rail is constructed with limited grades, I know I'm not the first to deal with this. When the rail goes from compacted fill to cut into bedrock (layered limestone and shale), I feel it will behave similar to a loading/unloading facility where the rail comes onto a fixed rigid structure. Should I maintain the ballast thickness constant along the length? Or would it be acceptable to use a thinner amount of ballast along the cuts in the bedrock?
Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet
Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals
Ballast on bedrock
- Thread starter TigerGuy
- Start date
TigerGuy:
Check the AREMA Stds. (American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association) Stds., and see what they have to say. Check with your local RR, their maintenance-of-way dept., and ask them what they would do. They’ll have some std. details. I’ll bet that when you put ballast on a hard surface, you have to confine it on the sides, maybe cut a trench in the bedrock for the ballast. Otherwise, usage will just rattle the ballast out from under the track and ties, in fairly short order. They do put track and ties, or just track directly on concrete grade beams.
Check the AREMA Stds. (American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association) Stds., and see what they have to say. Check with your local RR, their maintenance-of-way dept., and ask them what they would do. They’ll have some std. details. I’ll bet that when you put ballast on a hard surface, you have to confine it on the sides, maybe cut a trench in the bedrock for the ballast. Otherwise, usage will just rattle the ballast out from under the track and ties, in fairly short order. They do put track and ties, or just track directly on concrete grade beams.
- Thread starter
- #3
![[wink]](/data/assets/smilies/wink.gif "[wink] [wink]")
). I'll try and contact the local RR officials.- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question