Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Beam on Elastic Foundation

Status
Not open for further replies.

mmarlow

Structural
Aug 17, 2018
77
Hello,

I have a project where a customer wishes to tear down and existing boat house and build a new one on its foundation. With limited information we are assuming that the concrete foundations have the same width at the bottom as they do the top (2'-0") and that it is reinforced.

We know the following:
Subgrade modulus
Bearing capacity
f'c
Reinforcing wasn't found during concrete tests -- assuming un-reinforced.


The reason for the columns is that there are proposed concrete planks on the second floor.

The question is:
I have checked the existing foundations with approximate loading based on the proposed framing layout as a beam on elastic foundation. The bearing capacity seems to check out. The bending/flexure is what concerns me. I'd like to know if it is appropriate to analyze the foundations as plain concrete beams per (ACI 318 14.5.2.1). or the MOR x Sx (which is almost the same equation). The current structure is quite small, and quick checks look as if flexure due to service loads would not have exceeded the ACI Plain concrete flexural strength requirements. So flexure cracking has presumably not occurred.However, this has not been confirmed. Please see the attached PDF.

Any insight on whether the plain concrete formulas would be appreciated. We have proposed the use of helical piers without much luck.

Thank you

-MMARLOW EIT
 
 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=5b0f4963-a027-459e-a04d-72e8fd40622c&file=PDF.pdf
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Which ACI code are you referring to?

Regardless the beam on elastic foundation is a beam and your analysis should give shear and bending the beam needs to resist. If plain concrete works I suppose that would be ok but it seems unlikely unless your column loads are small.

Before going to helical piles you could try adding a steel beam on top of the existing wall such that the beam is stiff enough to reduce the existing pain concrete beam to acceptable limits. You may be able to do the same thing with a reinforced concrete beam as well.
 
Ideem,

Thank you for your input. Im using ACI 318-14.



I actually get quite a but of capacity out of the reinforced member:

f'c = 5*sqrt(3000) = 274psi
sx = (24*60^2)/6 = 14400 in^3

phi*Mn= 0.6 * 274 * 14400 *1/(12*1000) = 197k-ft

I'll look into that beam idea if we get to that point.
Thanks again



-MMARLOW EIT
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor