Structural.1997
Structural
- May 15, 2024
- 5
I have read a forum before saying that overburden loads can be neglected in bearing calculations if that same overburden load was there pre-construction. I asked a geotechnical engineer about this and he said that he has never heard of this. The consensus is my structural office is that this is not true and to design foundations according to Option 1 below.
Example:
Geotechnical report states that the factored Geotechnical Resistance is 130kPa.
Excavated depth of 4m and native soil density of 19kN/m3 ==> pre-construction load on the soil at 4m below grade will be 76kPa
Engineered fill density = 20kN/m3 at 4m depth ==> post-construction overburden load on shallow foundation = 80kPa
Option 1
I was taught to include the overburden as a load in the bearing calculations, this means that even without factoring the overburden weight I'm only left with 130-80=50kPa to carry the factored loads from the building. This sometimes makes spread footings impossible even for relatively small buildings that should be fine with spread footings.
Option 2
Neglect the overburden for bearing calculations (up to the pre-construction overburden levels) and only considering it for stability effects (ex. uplift and overturning).
It was suggested that I accomplish this by treating the factored soil capacity as 130kPa + 76kPa = 206kPa.
This would cause the overburden load to basically cancel out to zero (80kPa-76kPa=4kPa of additional overburden) in bearing checks but still be applied in stability checks. After cancelling out, the capacity would be equivalent to the 130kPa capacity listed in the geotech report.
The theory behind this is that the soil at that level has already experienced that 76kPa that was removed during excavation so the underlying soil wouldnt "feel" a stress increase until after another 76kPa is added.
I'm not sure that I'm describing this correctly, but feedback from Geotechnical Engineers would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Example:
Geotechnical report states that the factored Geotechnical Resistance is 130kPa.
Excavated depth of 4m and native soil density of 19kN/m3 ==> pre-construction load on the soil at 4m below grade will be 76kPa
Engineered fill density = 20kN/m3 at 4m depth ==> post-construction overburden load on shallow foundation = 80kPa
Option 1
I was taught to include the overburden as a load in the bearing calculations, this means that even without factoring the overburden weight I'm only left with 130-80=50kPa to carry the factored loads from the building. This sometimes makes spread footings impossible even for relatively small buildings that should be fine with spread footings.
Option 2
Neglect the overburden for bearing calculations (up to the pre-construction overburden levels) and only considering it for stability effects (ex. uplift and overturning).
It was suggested that I accomplish this by treating the factored soil capacity as 130kPa + 76kPa = 206kPa.
This would cause the overburden load to basically cancel out to zero (80kPa-76kPa=4kPa of additional overburden) in bearing checks but still be applied in stability checks. After cancelling out, the capacity would be equivalent to the 130kPa capacity listed in the geotech report.
The theory behind this is that the soil at that level has already experienced that 76kPa that was removed during excavation so the underlying soil wouldnt "feel" a stress increase until after another 76kPa is added.
I'm not sure that I'm describing this correctly, but feedback from Geotechnical Engineers would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.