EireChch
Geotechnical
- Jul 25, 2012
- 1,336
Hi All,
I have had a request land on my desk where a structural engineer needs a bearing capacity assessment of a foundation where the ground surface profile changes over the width of the bearing capacity failure wedge.
I have indicated that the exercise is pointless as a 6m wide foundation will be governed by bearing pressure based on settlement and not shear. This may not be true for foundations where there is an extreme change in ground profile over the width of bearing capacity failure wedge, but I am yet to confirm that.
I have been reading text books, online etc and I can not find a method to assess my specific case.
Das shows methods from Meyerhof for foundations which are set back from a slope, and where the toe of the slope is deeper than the embedment depth. Or where the foundation is sitting on an infinitely long slope. These cases are different than mine so I dont think they are applicable.
In my case the foundation depth is 2.7m, however on one side of the foundation the ground is flat for 2.3m then sloping at 1:3, over a height of 1.5m.
I indicated that we could just assume an embedment depth of 2.7-1.5m so 1.2m. This will be conservative. Apparently this is not acceptable. I think the structural has designed everything on a knife edge.
Interested to see if anyone has encountered such a problem
I have had a request land on my desk where a structural engineer needs a bearing capacity assessment of a foundation where the ground surface profile changes over the width of the bearing capacity failure wedge.
I have indicated that the exercise is pointless as a 6m wide foundation will be governed by bearing pressure based on settlement and not shear. This may not be true for foundations where there is an extreme change in ground profile over the width of bearing capacity failure wedge, but I am yet to confirm that.
I have been reading text books, online etc and I can not find a method to assess my specific case.
Das shows methods from Meyerhof for foundations which are set back from a slope, and where the toe of the slope is deeper than the embedment depth. Or where the foundation is sitting on an infinitely long slope. These cases are different than mine so I dont think they are applicable.
In my case the foundation depth is 2.7m, however on one side of the foundation the ground is flat for 2.3m then sloping at 1:3, over a height of 1.5m.
I indicated that we could just assume an embedment depth of 2.7-1.5m so 1.2m. This will be conservative. Apparently this is not acceptable. I think the structural has designed everything on a knife edge.
Interested to see if anyone has encountered such a problem
