tr6
Mechanical
- Oct 2, 2002
- 81
I've performed an FEA on a 1" thick plate, that is welded to the interior of the vessel. The plate has 2" dia holes on a 2-5/16" pitch. The edges of the holes are chamfered, to reduce stress risers.
I am now at the point of performing the stress linearizations. From Div 2, part 5, table 5.6 - "Perforated Head or shell", the membrane stesses can be obtained by running the SCL through the thickness of the plate. No problem. I've selected a mid-point in the ligament between the holes.
The description of the bending stress is confusing, to me anyway. "Averaged through width of ligament, but gradient through plate". My first thought was to run the SCL at an angle from the top edge of the hole, through the plate, across the ligament to the bottom edge of the adjacent hole. But then Section 5.A.3.c provides guidelines that the SCL should be normal to the mid-surface.
Or, do you average the bending stress through the thickness of the plate by running SCLs across the ligament between the corresponding nodes of the two adjacent holes? I hope I described that clearly.
Anyway, Thanks for your replies.
I am now at the point of performing the stress linearizations. From Div 2, part 5, table 5.6 - "Perforated Head or shell", the membrane stesses can be obtained by running the SCL through the thickness of the plate. No problem. I've selected a mid-point in the ligament between the holes.
The description of the bending stress is confusing, to me anyway. "Averaged through width of ligament, but gradient through plate". My first thought was to run the SCL at an angle from the top edge of the hole, through the plate, across the ligament to the bottom edge of the adjacent hole. But then Section 5.A.3.c provides guidelines that the SCL should be normal to the mid-surface.
Or, do you average the bending stress through the thickness of the plate by running SCLs across the ligament between the corresponding nodes of the two adjacent holes? I hope I described that clearly.
Anyway, Thanks for your replies.