AldenStan
Specifier/Regulator
- Dec 13, 2006
- 1
I'm demolishing an existing, derelict 3-story brownstone in a residential/industrial area of Brooklyn and building a five-story residential building in its place. The building shares a party wall on one side with a building of similar size. The other side is directly adjacent to a 60' four-story building. The lot is 20' wide.
A contractor has suggested that, rather than demolishing/underpinning/foundation/steel as a 4-step process by separate trades that we leave up the existing structure and do these tasks under and around the existing structure saving the demo for later. He suggests this so that the water and power remain, the need for scaffolding is reduced and the effect on the neighbors is masked and kept to a minimum.
Since my experience is limited to wood-frame single family construction, I'm wondering how sound this plan is.
Coincidentally, I could also use some recommendations on expereience trades in the area since all my connections are several counties north and trades won't travel.
TIA
A contractor has suggested that, rather than demolishing/underpinning/foundation/steel as a 4-step process by separate trades that we leave up the existing structure and do these tasks under and around the existing structure saving the demo for later. He suggests this so that the water and power remain, the need for scaffolding is reduced and the effect on the neighbors is masked and kept to a minimum.
Since my experience is limited to wood-frame single family construction, I'm wondering how sound this plan is.
Coincidentally, I could also use some recommendations on expereience trades in the area since all my connections are several counties north and trades won't travel.
TIA