Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Blocking in Floor Cavity for OOP Bracing - Full Height?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ambemily

Structural
Jul 2, 2018
20
I've always detailed blocking within the floor cavity, when the joists run parallel to an exterior wall, as full height. However, I have a builder that would like to install a partial height block at the top of the wall to allow ducting to run through the floor cavity. From my understanding the block needs to be nailed to the sheathing to transfer the OOP loads to the diaphragm. Is there any situation where that isn't necessary and only providing a block at the bottom (and maybe the top) of the cavity is okay, with a hollow center?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Wouldn't partial height blocking put your rim board into cross grain bending?

You could put partial height in the first joist space,and then full height in the second.
 
For the TLA averse, I suspect that OOP = Out of Plane.

Unless you're willing to use the ceiling as a diagram, I believe that you'll have to bring the loads up to the floor sheathing plane eventually. Something like I've shown below could garner you some duct space in any particular cavity but I've got a hunch that your builder will object to the cost & complexity. That's her problem though. I'd toss something like this on the table to show how creative and flexible I am and then let them pick from the available options.

c01_tkd6k7.jpg
 
Yes OOP = out of plane (where i come from).

How about a half baked compromise. Assuming you're using I-joists, would builder entertain the idea of using joist blocking with a hole sawed in the middle of the web? That way you have (at least some) in-plane shear capacity of the blocking. Guess it depends on how big the duct is. That way it would be a huge pain for the mechanical guy too!
 
I'd get crucified if I showed straps. At the main floor I feel they're unnecessary, at the upper floors I feel the demand is likely low enough that toe nails in each end of the blocks is potentially enough considering I put blocking at 24" on-centre. Then again, I'm half builder minded and half engineer minded. Many times I think something is overkill, until I run the numbers.

I still think you could omit the upper strap because the sheathing would provide enough tensile connection, I could see the need for the bottom strap, but getting them to install it would be unlikely.
 
jayrod12 said:
At the main floor I feel they're unnecessary, at the upper floors I feel the demand is likely low enough that toe nails in each end of the blocks is potentially enough considering I put blocking at 24" on-centre.

Curious, what makes you say that? I would have expected the demand to be at it's maximum at the main floor.

I'd not meant for anybody to get hung up on what straps go where or even if straps are required. My intent was simply to convey the general concept of the load path and to leave the particulars to the designer running the numbers / negotiating with the contractor. Toe nails up front and twist straps to bridge the joists would be one of many possible options.
 
The blocking is required at the main floor 100%. I just dont see the need for any tension connection as the blocking will always be in compression.

I can see the need for a tension connection between the top of wall and the blocking at the second floor with wind suction.
 
Ok, so you were referencing the main floor basement wall connection. I mistakenly thought you were thinking of the connection between the main floor walls and the second floor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor