Ranma05
Mechanical
- Mar 26, 2007
- 1
I am trying to incorporate Roark's plate theory into the design of a large flue (x-sectional area = 648 sq ft). Basically, I am using it to tell me how far apart I can place stiffeners based on a plate thickness of 0.25 in.
The proposed construction of the flue is from plates of 36 X 10 feet for the bottom and top, and 18 x 10 feet for the sides. The steady state pressure is 1 in of water, with a fly ash loading of 30 psi.
So far, I have assumed that since the stiffeners are to be welded to the plates, and the vertical plates welded to the horizontals, this signifies fixed boundary conditions on all edges.
However, when I run numbers through the calculator at efunda (assuming small deflections), the only spacing that doesn't violate the small deflection constrait is ridiculously small (stiffeners every square foot). I have seen that other flues have stiffeners every 4 feet.
I think that I may be wrong in assuming small deflections (< half the thickness of the plate).
Randy
The proposed construction of the flue is from plates of 36 X 10 feet for the bottom and top, and 18 x 10 feet for the sides. The steady state pressure is 1 in of water, with a fly ash loading of 30 psi.
So far, I have assumed that since the stiffeners are to be welded to the plates, and the vertical plates welded to the horizontals, this signifies fixed boundary conditions on all edges.
However, when I run numbers through the calculator at efunda (assuming small deflections), the only spacing that doesn't violate the small deflection constrait is ridiculously small (stiffeners every square foot). I have seen that other flues have stiffeners every 4 feet.
I think that I may be wrong in assuming small deflections (< half the thickness of the plate).
Randy