kamikazi929
Mechanical
- Apr 21, 2007
- 1
Hi all. I'm currently overseeing th refurbishment of a small vessel which has two stern drives. The main nut holding the propeller on is completely seized and made of bronze, whereas the frame is aluminium, any attempt to forcefully remove the nut will potentially cause extreme damage to the gearbox.
When in seawater I would expect galvanic corrosion to occurx but this vessel in particular is only in operation for around 40 days at year and stored in a shed the rest of the time.
Is the corrosion of two dissimilar metals faster in the presence of an electrolyte (seawater) or in the presence of oxygen when stored in a shed?
Both sterns drives have this design issue and was wondering why the designers - chose to have a bronze nut that is so susepitable to corrosion with an aluminium frame.
If we were to have 2 nuts manufactured from an alternative material what would be a more resistant material?
When in seawater I would expect galvanic corrosion to occurx but this vessel in particular is only in operation for around 40 days at year and stored in a shed the rest of the time.
Is the corrosion of two dissimilar metals faster in the presence of an electrolyte (seawater) or in the presence of oxygen when stored in a shed?
Both sterns drives have this design issue and was wondering why the designers - chose to have a bronze nut that is so susepitable to corrosion with an aluminium frame.
If we were to have 2 nuts manufactured from an alternative material what would be a more resistant material?