Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Brushless excitation 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

electrolitic

Electrical
Dec 9, 2007
105
Even new synchronous machines, specially Rotary Compensators, still use brushes/rings for field winding excitation current instead of brushless system. Probably the possibility of field polarity reversion is the reason.
When/why is this reversion necessary? Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You can't use field forcing to rapidly reduce the field strength on loss of load with brushless systems.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
 
So, considering the rotary compensator, the field forcing can provide a faster response and a better regulation performance when field weakening becomes necessary. Am I right? Thanks waross.
 
I believe so but wait for some replies from those with more experience with large machines. I haven't been around field forcing for about 40 years. Some of our other posters will have more knowledge on current practices.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
 
A slipring machine can have a faster response because one of the R-L time constants is eliminated in the rotating exciter, and because the slipring machine can, when provided with a four-quadrant rectifier fed from a suitable supply, actively suppress the field by regenerating into the source.
 
waross and SkottyUK.thanks. Simple and direct as your answers.
 
I don't even think that you need a 4Q supply. That would be if you need to reverse excitation current. But in this case, all you need is a counter-EMF, which a simple thyristor rectifier can create. But you can not have a free-wheeling diode. Or a half-controlled bridge.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.
 
Basler might have a paper on it. I remember sitting through one of their presentations at one stage on migration from a brushless excitation system to a slipring one. The summary of the whole presentation was effectively what ScottyUK said though.

EDMS Australia
 
Freddy,

A regenerating generator rotor looks a lot like a current source, so Skogs is right - a fully-controlled bridge will meet the requirement for two quadrant operation. Four quadrant would actually reverse the field polarity, which doesn't happen in practice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor