Erhard
Petroleum
- Feb 9, 2011
- 3
It seems to be a problem for a lot of piping stress engineers using Caesar II for calculating nozzle loads on pumps/vessels/exchangers/etc.
Depending on the equipment, our business rule will depict whether we will model in the equipment or not. In cases such as vessels/exchangers we will model in the equipment due to the expansion coeff of the equipment material itself that will play a part in the expansion/growth of the equipment with the expansion of the piping.
In cases where pumps are involved, we would usually just anchor the line at that point, however the general feel is that the point on the flange is not rigidly fixed, and thus the use of a stifness parameter should be used?
My query thus do there exist a table with typical stiffness coeff/rates that could be used in Caesar to ease the high nozzle loads/moments calculated when only anchoring the line at a specific pump suction/discharge nozzle?
Any comments welcome.
Depending on the equipment, our business rule will depict whether we will model in the equipment or not. In cases such as vessels/exchangers we will model in the equipment due to the expansion coeff of the equipment material itself that will play a part in the expansion/growth of the equipment with the expansion of the piping.
In cases where pumps are involved, we would usually just anchor the line at that point, however the general feel is that the point on the flange is not rigidly fixed, and thus the use of a stifness parameter should be used?
My query thus do there exist a table with typical stiffness coeff/rates that could be used in Caesar to ease the high nozzle loads/moments calculated when only anchoring the line at a specific pump suction/discharge nozzle?
Any comments welcome.