pipesnpumps
Mechanical
- Dec 4, 2002
- 316
Example:
A system where the design shall use the area/density method of the occupancy hazard fire control approach, and must be designed for 3,000 sq ft of area.
A mechanical room designed for OH-1 is 1,000 sq ft.
The remainder of the building, is Light Hazard. The building is larger than 3,000 sq ft.
Key point: Room design method is not allowed. Calcs must use area/density method. (Figure 11.2.3.1.1, the design/area curves)
A 35 yr NICET is telling me that he is only required to calculate flow for the sprinklers in the Mechanical Room (OH-1 hazard), and is not required to include adjacent areas into the hydraulic calculations for that design area.
He says that the design areas for different hazards should not be mixed. He says calc 1,000 sq ft Mechanical room for the "Ordinary Hazard Case", and calc the 3,000 sq ft for the "Light Hazard Case".
What do you think? Is he right?
The way I do the estimated calcs on performanced based engineer plans is take an entire 3,000 sf area, with part of it designed for OH-1 and part designed for Light hazard.
I am not a NICET, so I'm sure I could have misunderstood something along the way. Neither NFPA 13 or the handbook notes give any guidance or clear direction.
Real world knowledge doesn't fall out of the sky on a parachute, but rather is gained in small increments during moments of panic or curiosity.
A system where the design shall use the area/density method of the occupancy hazard fire control approach, and must be designed for 3,000 sq ft of area.
A mechanical room designed for OH-1 is 1,000 sq ft.
The remainder of the building, is Light Hazard. The building is larger than 3,000 sq ft.
Key point: Room design method is not allowed. Calcs must use area/density method. (Figure 11.2.3.1.1, the design/area curves)
A 35 yr NICET is telling me that he is only required to calculate flow for the sprinklers in the Mechanical Room (OH-1 hazard), and is not required to include adjacent areas into the hydraulic calculations for that design area.
He says that the design areas for different hazards should not be mixed. He says calc 1,000 sq ft Mechanical room for the "Ordinary Hazard Case", and calc the 3,000 sq ft for the "Light Hazard Case".
What do you think? Is he right?
The way I do the estimated calcs on performanced based engineer plans is take an entire 3,000 sf area, with part of it designed for OH-1 and part designed for Light hazard.
I am not a NICET, so I'm sure I could have misunderstood something along the way. Neither NFPA 13 or the handbook notes give any guidance or clear direction.
Real world knowledge doesn't fall out of the sky on a parachute, but rather is gained in small increments during moments of panic or curiosity.