Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

CAN/CSA S16-01 Steel Beam-Column Design

Status
Not open for further replies.

qu4a

Structural
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
2
Location
ZA
When designing a beam-column to CAN/CSA S16-01, non-uniform moment are taken into account in two places:
When calculating Mu, omega 2 accounts for the non-uniform moments as a function of the moments at the ends of the (laterally) unbraced length.
When calculating the combined axial force and bending moment effects, omega 1 accounts for the non-uniform moments as function of the moments at the ends of the member.
Am I correct in saying that these two omega values are essentially different although they account for the same thing - the ends of a member and the unbraced ends may not necessarily be the same thing? Please could someone shed some more light on this topic for me. Thanks.
 
They are two different values representing similar conditions.

w1(omega1) = 0.6 - 0.4(M1/M2) but is >= 0.4 where M1 is the smaller end moment

w2 = 1.75 + 1.05(M1/M2) + 0.3 (M1/M2)^2 <= 2.5 and is equal to 1.0 for a moment within the span.

Dik
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top