Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Cervical injury during rear end collision

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tavy87

Bioengineer
Aug 19, 2011
1
0
0
US
Hello,

I'm trying to figure out if two scenarios have different physiological outcomes on the neck during a collision.

First scenario: Driver in car at rest, directly rear ended by a large object moving at a high velocity.

Second scenario: Driver in car moving backwards at a high velocity, runs into a large object that is not moving.

Assuming things like head positioning and awareness are the same in both cases, would there be any reason to see a different outcome from the neck's point of view? My intuition tells me there is no difference when certain assumptions are met, but maybe I'm missing something. Thanks for your help!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

US barrier crash tests seem to be based on practical equivalence, i.e., moving barrier strikes stationary test article. I have no knowledge that strict equivalence has been proven or not.

I would expect some differences, but they may not be important in something as violent and irreproducible as a car crash.


Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
 
Most of the video I've ever seen from the IIS crash testing is a moving vehicle against stationary obstacle. Just given the difference in momentum and kinetic energy, I don't see how a moving obstacle could duplicate the impact energy and momentum of a moving vehicle impact.

TTFN

FAQ731-376
Chinese prisoner wins Nobel Peace Prize
 
Go with your gut, "certain assumptions" not withstanding, how can the localized neck of interest possibly see any difference between the different impacts? Draw up the FBD and puzzle it out, objective velocity shouldn't have any bearing on an impact, just the relative accelerations involved.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top