wangp1283
Automotive
- Oct 19, 2004
- 56
In an chain drive I'm design, the majority of the length of the chain will be slack and under no tension. In another word, between the driving sprocket and the driven sprocket, the chain the is under tension (load), but for the rest of the chain, the chain is slack.
But the slack chain is very long and will tend to drip. I cannot shorten the chain because it's essential to the application. I can "take up" the slack chain with some idler sprockets.
So my question is this: since the chain is under no load, the design of the idler sprockets or its placement isn't that important right? (from an efficiency point of view). For example, I don't even need the idler sprocket to have teeth to perfectly mate with the slack chain. I can just use a bare cylinder to "take up" the slack chain. Even though this will create some noise when then chain is running. But because its the slack part of the chain, it virtually has no effect on the efficency?
The reason I'm asking this is because it's hard to design an suitable idler due to the unique geometry of this special chain.
Thanks.
But the slack chain is very long and will tend to drip. I cannot shorten the chain because it's essential to the application. I can "take up" the slack chain with some idler sprockets.
So my question is this: since the chain is under no load, the design of the idler sprockets or its placement isn't that important right? (from an efficiency point of view). For example, I don't even need the idler sprocket to have teeth to perfectly mate with the slack chain. I can just use a bare cylinder to "take up" the slack chain. Even though this will create some noise when then chain is running. But because its the slack part of the chain, it virtually has no effect on the efficency?
The reason I'm asking this is because it's hard to design an suitable idler due to the unique geometry of this special chain.
Thanks.