murdock
Chemical
- Jun 17, 2002
- 48
I am evaluating the velocity of flow through a rip rap channel with stone check dams. Modeling just the reach with the rip rap (n=0.04) gave a velocity of about 3 ft/s. When I used two ponds (modeling the two check dams), the velocity was much higher (6.2 ft/s).
I recognize this as the pond not accounting for the roughness of the channel. How do I account for both the roughness of the channel and the storage of the pond? I considered using a reach (with the full length of the swale up to the check dam) followed by a pond (to account for the storage). However, is this making the actual structure longer than it really is? IOW, breaking up the swale into 2 nodes gives it the appearance of flow traveling from the swale into a storage structure, instead of the swale *being* the storage structure?
I recognize this as the pond not accounting for the roughness of the channel. How do I account for both the roughness of the channel and the storage of the pond? I considered using a reach (with the full length of the swale up to the check dam) followed by a pond (to account for the storage). However, is this making the actual structure longer than it really is? IOW, breaking up the swale into 2 nodes gives it the appearance of flow traveling from the swale into a storage structure, instead of the swale *being* the storage structure?