Blairsy
Geotechnical
- Dec 22, 2016
- 24
I am attempting to estimate the time rate of primary consolidation for a particular soil profile due to placement of a large area fill load.
We drilled several SPT borings at the site and determined that the subsurface profile generally consists of 10 feet of existing fill (mostly granular, medium dense to dense) over 3 feet of silty fibrous peat over up to 40 feet of Boston Blue Clay (BBC)(CL) to contact with a gravel layer. Based on the SPT data, the BBC ranges in consistency from stiff (top 1/3) to soft/very soft (middle 1/3) to medium stiff (lower 1/3). Out of all the borings, we were only able to walk away with one reliable tube sample (taken in the soft clay), which I submitted for a 1D incremental consolidation test. My Cc and Cr values from the consolidation curve reconstruction agree fairly well with published BBC values and my Cc value is on par with some of the liquid limit correlations. With that said, I have run through some other correlations for the peat and stiffer clay layers to get the information necessary to calculate the total (ultimate) primary consolidation settlement of each layer and all layers combined. I am now stuck at the time-rate portion of this exercise.
The lab results for the consolidation test provide a summary table of values associated with the end of primary consolidation (EOP) for each load increment relative to Log of Time and Square Root of Time space. One of those values is the coefficient of consolidation (Cv) such that there is a Cv value for each load increment (as there should be since Cv is a function of k which changes with e). I understand this is all pretty basic so far, so here is my ultimate question: is there a correct approach to selecting a correct Cv value out of the bunch for use in the time-rate calculation to determine time (t) at 90% consolidation?
I have considered doing the following and seeing what happens:
1. Averaging all the Cv values.
2. Selecting the Cv value associated with the load increment stress nearest to the proposed vertical effective stress.
Once I determine the above, would it be acceptable to apply that Cv value to the entire BBC thickness even though there are definite differences in stress history?
Any input is greatly appreciated!
We drilled several SPT borings at the site and determined that the subsurface profile generally consists of 10 feet of existing fill (mostly granular, medium dense to dense) over 3 feet of silty fibrous peat over up to 40 feet of Boston Blue Clay (BBC)(CL) to contact with a gravel layer. Based on the SPT data, the BBC ranges in consistency from stiff (top 1/3) to soft/very soft (middle 1/3) to medium stiff (lower 1/3). Out of all the borings, we were only able to walk away with one reliable tube sample (taken in the soft clay), which I submitted for a 1D incremental consolidation test. My Cc and Cr values from the consolidation curve reconstruction agree fairly well with published BBC values and my Cc value is on par with some of the liquid limit correlations. With that said, I have run through some other correlations for the peat and stiffer clay layers to get the information necessary to calculate the total (ultimate) primary consolidation settlement of each layer and all layers combined. I am now stuck at the time-rate portion of this exercise.
The lab results for the consolidation test provide a summary table of values associated with the end of primary consolidation (EOP) for each load increment relative to Log of Time and Square Root of Time space. One of those values is the coefficient of consolidation (Cv) such that there is a Cv value for each load increment (as there should be since Cv is a function of k which changes with e). I understand this is all pretty basic so far, so here is my ultimate question: is there a correct approach to selecting a correct Cv value out of the bunch for use in the time-rate calculation to determine time (t) at 90% consolidation?
I have considered doing the following and seeing what happens:
1. Averaging all the Cv values.
2. Selecting the Cv value associated with the load increment stress nearest to the proposed vertical effective stress.
Once I determine the above, would it be acceptable to apply that Cv value to the entire BBC thickness even though there are definite differences in stress history?
Any input is greatly appreciated!