Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Cohesive law behind crack tip not debonded in Explicit

Status
Not open for further replies.

compabaq

Materials
Apr 25, 2008
14
I'm modelling the debonding between two interfaces in a 3D model using a cohesive zone. When I was using Implicit, the CSMAXSCRT and CPRESS showed nice, regular behaviour. With this, I mean that the contours are more or less straight over the width of the interface. When I switched to Explicit however, I found that CSMAXSCRT had several regions behind the crack tip that did not reach 1. This implies that the cohesive law has not reached its initiation value yet. Similarly, CPRESS also has regions with unusually high values (higher than they should be, given the crack opening at that location and the cohesive law that I used).

I have tried all sorts of stabilisation approaches (mass scaling, viscosity in the cohesive law, bulk viscosity, using a time increment lower than the stable time increment predicted by Abaqus, ...), but none of these resolve these issues. Do you have any other suggestions what could be causing this strange behaviour

Kind regards,
Comp
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor