johnnymist2003
Mechanical
- Apr 16, 2003
- 100
Hi all,
perhaps some assistance here. I have an heat exchanger, fixed tubesheet, which is extended for bolting on the inlet and outlet channels via girth flanges. Tubeside has a single pass. The inlet and outlet nozzles are on the same horizontal centreline as the tubesheet. They are NPS 30 in size. Each of the nozzles are connected to conical sections, from NPS 30 to 1400 mm I.D. My question is this. May the conical sections be welded directly to the NPS 30 flange (which is connectetd to piping) and then at the other end onto the 1400 mm I.D. girth flange which is then bolted onto the tubesheet. The reason I ask is that ASME VIII, Div.1 sets up limits for reinforcement of the large and small ends of the conical section and assumes that there is some area available in the small and large end cylinders. How does one account for this requirement if the cones are welded directly to flanges ?
John
perhaps some assistance here. I have an heat exchanger, fixed tubesheet, which is extended for bolting on the inlet and outlet channels via girth flanges. Tubeside has a single pass. The inlet and outlet nozzles are on the same horizontal centreline as the tubesheet. They are NPS 30 in size. Each of the nozzles are connected to conical sections, from NPS 30 to 1400 mm I.D. My question is this. May the conical sections be welded directly to the NPS 30 flange (which is connectetd to piping) and then at the other end onto the 1400 mm I.D. girth flange which is then bolted onto the tubesheet. The reason I ask is that ASME VIII, Div.1 sets up limits for reinforcement of the large and small ends of the conical section and assumes that there is some area available in the small and large end cylinders. How does one account for this requirement if the cones are welded directly to flanges ?
John