Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Construction Dewatering as soil improvement? 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Silty

Geotechnical
Jun 6, 2017
43
0
0
CA
Hi Everyone, if a site with loose saturated sand and silt requires dewatering for construction, can dewatering be considered as a soil improvement method? Can bearing capacity, liquection resistance and soil parameters be increased provided that boreholes are drilled after dewatering to verify?
Please share thought and tips on in what circumstances you consider it appropriate.
Thank you so much
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I've heard of dewatering being used to assist with pre-construction consolidation. Is it the regular groundwater elevation you are fighting? If so, don't forget what will happen when the pumps are turned off.
 
While a lower groundwater table does improve bearing capacity, settlement, liquefaction resistance, it cannot be considered as ground improvement.

Like TG said, what happens when the pumps turn off. This is dewatering for construction...

Lowering groundwater is one method to improve slope stability however this is achieved by passive drainage (counterfort drains, horizontal drains etc). Even then there is still some level of gw table considered as we accept that drains will eventually block or partially block and need regular maintenance.
 

Probably negligible improvement . In order dewatering to be considered as a soil improvement method, the dewatering shall be effective for the settleable layer and a consolidation settlement shall be achieved. In this case, the dewatering depth is limited with construction depth. When the pumps turn of, the soil conditions will be similar as previous posters said.

You may look wickdrain to get the concept.
 
It wont be negligible in terms of bearing capacity anyways, likely 30-40% increase if groundwater is below the failure wedge and you can use the full gamma in the third bearing capacity term.

But regardless its not a good idea as its impractical to keep a site dewatered for the life of a structure and also risky to assume that it will stay dewatered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top