Rusty Shackleford
Mechanical
- Oct 17, 2016
- 6
My company performs 3rd party testing to verify equipment performance. We typically do not know the end use of the equipment so we test all features. In the case of electrical contacts (I'm dealing specifically with a NEMA size 1 contactor auxiliary contact blocks), manufacturers publish the make, break and continuous ratings for the contacts. I have the following questions:
1) Wouldn't a system designer only need to look at the break rating when evaluating components since this is the lowest rating? What is the purpose of publishing the continuous rating? Are there scenarios where the contact would be subjected to a higher continuous current that the contact would not break?
2) To verify the 'current capacity' of the auxiliary contact, my company typically performs a temperature rise test at the continuous current rating. Going back to my first question, if the contact was selected such that it would never see continuous current higher than the break rating, is the temperature rise test really appropriate? It is my belief that break testing would be appropriate, performed per NEMA ICS 5.
3) I have no problem performing a temperature rise test as well, but for financial reasons would prefer not to if it is unnecessary.
Please keep answers simple as I'm a mechanical engineer...Thanks in advance!
1) Wouldn't a system designer only need to look at the break rating when evaluating components since this is the lowest rating? What is the purpose of publishing the continuous rating? Are there scenarios where the contact would be subjected to a higher continuous current that the contact would not break?
2) To verify the 'current capacity' of the auxiliary contact, my company typically performs a temperature rise test at the continuous current rating. Going back to my first question, if the contact was selected such that it would never see continuous current higher than the break rating, is the temperature rise test really appropriate? It is my belief that break testing would be appropriate, performed per NEMA ICS 5.
3) I have no problem performing a temperature rise test as well, but for financial reasons would prefer not to if it is unnecessary.
Please keep answers simple as I'm a mechanical engineer...Thanks in advance!