Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Contribution of beam web connection in the moment transfer at bolted flange plate connection

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nitesh Sadashiva

Civil/Environmental
Jan 9, 2020
33
Hello all,

In one of the project there were lot of beam to column flange moment connections. Fabricator insisted on providing bolted flange plate connection between beam and column flange. Unfortunately, the moments were heavy. Providing the bolts in the beam flanges reduces the flange tension rupture capacity due to the reduction in flange area. So, we were forced to provide CJP weld at beam flanges. But the fabricator was not okay in providing CJP welds. Alternatively, we proposed beam size increment to use bolted flange plate connection. But the EOR has responded as noted below.
"Our first reaction is that the calculation the connection engineer is using to assess that the beams need to be upsized is overly conservative. Specifically, the calculation taken assumes all of the moment supported by the beams is in the flanges, and that when the bolt holes are considered, the beam doesn’t work. In fact, however, a significant amount of the moment is resisted by the beam web, so the web and the flanges share the stresses. Over the length of the connection, the moment in the web will be gradually unloaded into the flanges and the bolts. Therefore, just because the beam flanges alone would not support the moment reaction, it doesn’t mean that the bolted connection doesn’t work. We believe the vast majority if not all of the current beams should be able to be designed with moment connections without upsizing the beams. One way to look at it while maintaining the simplified force-couple approach would be to consider a portion of the web as the stem of a “T” which resists the moment, instead of just the flanges alone providing the force-couple. As you can see in the attached example calculation for one of the W30x90’s, the beam works fine when this approach is taken".
[URL unfurl="true"]https://res.cloudinary.com/engineering-com/image/upload/v1658465431/tips/Beam_Moment_Connection_-_Example_ou0jwe.pdf[/url]

I haven't seen any moment connection designed by considering the web contribution in the moment transfer. I couldn't find any supporting document to proceed this way. Did any one came across this situation? Your suggestions will help a lot.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Some thoughts:

Picture2_fqqqnh.png


1) Beam flexural rupture (not flange tension rupture capacity, as you stated) w/ holes in the tension flange has been a known issue. A very good alternate calc is provided in the AISC Engineering Journal, 2016, 3rd Quarter, paper titled "Strength of Beams in Beam-to-Column Connections with Holes in the Tension Flange." Refer specifically to proposed model 3, Eq. 13. I am not having any issues with the W30x90 handling 845 ft-kips (344 kips flg force) w/ 3/4"x15" bolted flg plates, w/ 3/8" fillet welds.

2) For simple flange pl to columns, most people don't consider the web connection to attract any flexure or flange force from the moment demand, and they can be designed as "bearing." There are cases when we do consider the shear load contribution to the flange force, but it's conservative and limited to situations where a shear and axially loaded strut shares a gusset w/ the diagonal braces.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor