I think one approach of control of throttle valve is controlling the pressure at the suction drum so it stays at a specified value. The valve opens or close thereby creating a back pressure which keeps the suction drum pressure at specified value. In this case, the discharge pressure of the compressor is resulting, or so to say floating. The only way to control the discharge pressure, if needed, would be to use flow recycle as additional control method by opening FV-139.
In this example it seems different philosophy applies since it was indicated the suction throttle valve is controlled based on compressor discharge pressure (62 bar). So for instance if the sales gas mass flow decreases, the discharge pressure would increase because the compressor speed is constant. In this case, the controller would gradually close the throttle valve as a result the suction pressure of the compressor reduces. Correspondingly, the actual flow increases which would then reduce discharge pressure by some amount (because the compressor point move to the right of the curve) in addition to the reduction due to decrease of suction pressure ; these are not conflicting objectives.
One point here:
When the suction throttle valve is actuated towards the closed position, it creates a back pressure on the feeding line upstream, which would reduce the mass flow ; this effect however is conflicting. Here I am not sure if because this would be of secondary order it would supposedly help to make the control loop stable. Maybe someone could help and clarify.