Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Correct hole size for a given O-ring 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

rcr22b

Mechanical
Sep 21, 2006
7
The O-ring is AS568a -008.

This is a nominal size 3/16" ID x 5/16 OD" x 1/16" wide.

For a shaft .311" I decided on a gland grove of .0625" depth x .070" wide.

Tolerance on the shaft is +.000 / -.002.

The shaft is mild steel. And the application is a compression screw running in 6061 aluminum head on a model diesel engine.

What is the correct size for the bore?

I guessing +.001"

Meaning that if the shaft is in fact .311" then the bore would be .312"

Or, shaft .310" and bore .311"

Am I correct or not?

Should I be tighter than .001? Or less?


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Parker's catalog and free software tells you what size to make the mating components of an o-ring depending on the type of joint and material being seals. I'd check into those.



--Scott

 
rcr22b,

I suggest you download a copy of the parker o-ring handbook
The optimal dimensions depend on whether it is a dynamic or static seal and whether the shaft spins or is stationary etc. See page V-25 for the various dynamic seals or section IV for static seals. I have carried a copy of this handbook for 35 years (first published 1957). I consider it the bible for o-ring applications. If you are really lucky, the local Parker dealer can get you a hard copy.

Timelord
 
Yeah, look at an Oring manufacturers catalogue as they usually give formulas/guidance for this.

In the UK I seem to recal a British Standard that had this information for standard sizes, not sure I've seen the same in the US.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
 
Timelord,

I studied the Parker catalog but while it helped me decide on the proper grove for the ID I could not find anything to tell me the correct size for the bore.

This is a static seal, but it does have limited rotation if the compression screw is adjusted to raise or lower the compression slightly.

Anyway, thanks to everyone for the replies.

 
rcr22b,

Page IV-5 of 20 shows the gland you want. The dimensions are tabulated on the following several pages for each size o-ring including the bore size (columns A or D). A Parker 2-008 is the nominal size you gave. Another thing, you may have trouble streching this small of an ID over the OD of the rod.

Timelord
 
From the Apple Rubber Products catalogue;

Static Radial Seal (for -008 O-ring)
Bore Dia = .295" +.002/-0
Piston (Shaft) Dia = .294" +0/-.001
Piston Groove Dia = .186" +0/-.001
Gland Width = .105" +.010/-0

Pressure limited to 1500 psi.


Obviously the above only applies for suitable surface finishes.

[cheers]
 
Timelord,

I see it now.

Thanks.
 
The bore to shaft clearance depends on the o-ring material and pressure to be sealed. The clearance determines whether or not the o-ring will extrude into the clearance. If your pressure is low you can allow more clearance.

The gland dimensions determine the correct squeeze for the o-ring and allowance for the o-ring to displace when squeezed in the gland without rolling. I believe the actual cross-section of the 1/16 o-ring is .070 inches.

The Parker handbook describes the pressure/material/extrusion relationship as well as other seal and gland data. The Parker handbook was my friend for years, too.

Ted
 

Note that the ether used in model diesel engine fuels is very aggressive with any standard O ring material (eg Viton, nbr, etc, etc.)

Hence the reason contra pistons are usually a transition fit.


Cheers


Harry
 
Pud,

"Note that the ether used in model diesel engine fuels is very aggressive with any standard O ring material (eg Viton, nbr, etc, etc.)"

This is not a contra piston. It uses a compression plug and Viton o-ring and I don't know how ether affects it.

But it's worth looking into.

Thanks.
 
You can mathematically determine the compression and stretch of any elastomer, given its cross sectional diameter and gland geometry.

For a male gland of seal diameter A, gland diameter of B1 and elastomer cross section CS then the percentage squeeze is:

%squeeze=[1-(A-B1)/(2 CS)) X 100.

Likewise, the percentage stretch is:

%stretch=[(B1-d)/d] X 100, d=inner diameter of o-ring.

The female gland uses exactly the same equations, except the seal diameter is now B and gland diameter A1.

%squeeze=[1-(A1-B)/(2 CS)) X 100
%stretch=[(B-d)/d] X 100, d=inner diameter of o-ring.

Typically the percentage stretch regardless of o-ring size or application, static/dynamic, is 2% to 3%. However, the percentage squeeze varies according to static application and cross sectional diameter, or dynamic application and cross sectional diameter. I follow the Parker-Hannifin suggested squeezes to the letter in this regard.

A lot of engineers will simply interpolate between line entries of their o-ring size and application. This is alright, but I've found that in the case of bastardized gland geometries or cross sectional diameters of o-rings made from primer cord of differing thicknesses, that the pure mathematical approach is much simpler.

Analytically, the equations regarding squeeze can be mathematically determined noting the o-ring shape deforms from a circle to an ellipse. This deformation is responsible for "gland fill", which is why the gland width needs to be larger than the cross sectional diameter of the o-ring. You can determine this width by usage of Poisson's Ratio, noting the mechanical deformation of the rubber.

But I do agree with the previous entry, just use the Parker-Hannifin Handbook. It is absolutely the best source on the market and should be sitting right beside the Machinist Handbook on your book shelf.

Kenneth J Hueston, PEng
Principal
Sturni-Hueston Engineering Inc
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
 
Thanks for all the replies.

I have downloaded the Parker handbook and think I've got it figured out.

The bore size should be .312 with a gland depth of .050.

 
Ewh, the rest of the pages are ear marked to the left of the main text. They are arranged like chapters in a book, just click on it and that section will open.

It's the way Adobe organizes the virtual book these days! The whole book is there.

Kenneth J Hueston, PEng
Principal
Sturni-Hueston Engineering Inc
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor