BobPE
Civil/Environmental
- Jan 28, 2002
- 900
I am wondering what those people who use the services of engineering firms think about this.
In my job I compete regularly with other consulting firms to get projects here in the US. I have had the opportunity to go up against many good firms. I have also had the opportunity to go up against some not so good firms. I recently lost a project to a smaller firm that was charged with giving bribes and was banned for a period of several years from performing engineering services in various states. This is not common knowledge amoung users of engineering services that the firm has been punished for their activities. They have expanded their market territory to "grow the company" which is code for the fact that they wore out their welcome where their main office is located. I am seeing the same MO for their operations around my main office now. We were more qualified and equal price on a bid, the selection committee was in favor of us, but there was a ruling vote that came from a political position. Our loss was because of that vote ande this questionably ethical firm got the project.
I was wondering two things:
How would you members feel that regularly use engineering services about getting a firm that paid for your work, but the payment had nothing to do with improving your project?
The second thing for other consulting members is what would you say to cleints when you know this firm is bidding and that the client has no clue about the past publically documented antics of the firm?
I am just curious to understand how people perceive consulting firms. From what I see in here it seems that consulting firms are their own worst enemy and from the antics that I described its no wonder why.
BobPE
In my job I compete regularly with other consulting firms to get projects here in the US. I have had the opportunity to go up against many good firms. I have also had the opportunity to go up against some not so good firms. I recently lost a project to a smaller firm that was charged with giving bribes and was banned for a period of several years from performing engineering services in various states. This is not common knowledge amoung users of engineering services that the firm has been punished for their activities. They have expanded their market territory to "grow the company" which is code for the fact that they wore out their welcome where their main office is located. I am seeing the same MO for their operations around my main office now. We were more qualified and equal price on a bid, the selection committee was in favor of us, but there was a ruling vote that came from a political position. Our loss was because of that vote ande this questionably ethical firm got the project.
I was wondering two things:
How would you members feel that regularly use engineering services about getting a firm that paid for your work, but the payment had nothing to do with improving your project?
The second thing for other consulting members is what would you say to cleints when you know this firm is bidding and that the client has no clue about the past publically documented antics of the firm?
I am just curious to understand how people perceive consulting firms. From what I see in here it seems that consulting firms are their own worst enemy and from the antics that I described its no wonder why.
BobPE