This may be related to your request. It is real simple to produce an estimate of cut and fill volumes. Since we are just wrapping up a cross-sectional analysis for a site design by hand, I want to share our easy method, if not just to provide a perspective.
We began by reviewing the site and defining the grading concept. The site is a rectangle that is high in the NE corner and deep in the SW corner. To level the site for purposes of water storage, we are mostly filling it up beginning at the SW corner.
Based on a drawing showing the PLs, existing and proposed contours, we took six sections of the site at 50 ft intervals from the west PL to the east PL. To help us organize the sections, we defined the east PL as station zero, and then we marked every half station on the plot until the west PL. For each section, we plotted the existing elevations and the proposed elevations. The area beneath where the proposed grade exceeds the existing was reserved for a fill computation. The area beneath where the existing grade exceeds the proposed was reserved for a cut computation.
Sta 0+00
--------------------------
,,,,'
,,,,,''''''''''
,,,,,,''''''
(S) (N)
Where - is the proposed grade and , or ' is the existing.
The volumes were computed using a spreadsheet. For example, the computation for the fill volume between stations zero and a half is shown (all units are "English"):
("Station") (Fill Area) (Average Fill Area) (Volume)
0+00 100
150 150*50/27
0+50 200
Using this example, we would estimate that the required fill of the westernmost fifth of the site would be 278 CY.
This was a fairly detailed earthwork quantity analysis that could have been performed even more accurately and much more quickly in AutoCAD or MicroStation.
Is this what you are after?