Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Decoupling fundamental frequencies of PCB and chassis using Steinberg Octave Rule

Status
Not open for further replies.

markpheus

Aerospace
Sep 26, 2012
2
Hi guys,

Just a question regarding PCB and PCB enclosure/chassis design. Steinberg states that the fundamental frequency of the PCB and chassis be decoupled by an octave or greater but mentions noting of PCB/Chassis relative orientation or mass participation.

For example: If I mount a PCB parallel to a simply supported beam. I am comparing the Mode 1 for each, which, due to their shape and support is in Z direction for both (BTW using same coordinate system for both).

Lets say that I don't achieve decoupling, Mode 1 for beam is 600 Hz and Mode 1 for PCB is 600 Hz both modes in Z -direction.

If I now change design and have the PCB mounted perpendicular to the beam. Its critical axis is now in X-axis and at 90 degrees to the beam. Mode 1 for PCB is still 600 Hz but in X-direction and Mode 2 for PCB is in Z-direction and is 1200 Hz.

Question is: is PCB and chassis coupled because Mode 1 for PCB = Mode 1 for beam or is it decoupled because Mode 1 for beam is 600 Hz in Z-direction and the corresponding Mode (Mode 2 in Z direction) of PCB is 1200 Hz?

Thanks in advance,

Mark
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You may get some reduction in response but you'll still have a strong 600 Hz resonance. Mode shapes don't understand our puny 3 axis coordinates, they are really energy flows, and have no trouble going round corners.

A factor of 2 on frequency separation is rather an excellent criterion, half that is good enough (a highly damped system may have enough bandwidth for 50% separation to be insufficient, but highly damped systems aren't the problem).

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376
 
Thanks Greg,

I thought this much since the orthogonality of the respective modes is never mentioned!

Do you know of a source for proof of this? Book, publication or something else I can reference?

Kind regards,

Mark
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor