hudson888
Mechanical
- Jun 19, 2007
- 2,275
We have a task to create a lens with thousands of tiny pyramids,(four sides 1mm square 0.2 high). These are arranged in a grid pattern approx 60 by 40 in a thin flat block with a 0.1mm gap between them at the base.
The desired result is as if a thin flat sheet with these pyramids all over it were to be bent curved in both directions to fit a slightly contoured surface. That is to say that the surface has differing curvature in U and V directions.
I have tried to use global shaping and I have got a result. The result is a solid bent accurately to fit the shape of the surface. Unfortunately the pyramids at the outer edges are skewed slightly towards the center in a way that simply wouldn't happen if the part were flexible and wrapped to the surface.
I've tried overcrown and stretch options with identical results. I can't see how a law function would work in this case, but I'm certainly willing to be corrected.
We're using NX-3. I can't spot any real difference in NX-4 and we haven't installed NX-5 yet.
If anyone knows of a better way to tackle the problem I'd appreciate your suggestion.
Regards
Hudson
P.S.
We know that we can get the desired result if we create sweeps in either direction alternately uniting and subtracting. However this is long winded tedious and the model quickly becomes quite heavy indeed.
The desired result is as if a thin flat sheet with these pyramids all over it were to be bent curved in both directions to fit a slightly contoured surface. That is to say that the surface has differing curvature in U and V directions.
I have tried to use global shaping and I have got a result. The result is a solid bent accurately to fit the shape of the surface. Unfortunately the pyramids at the outer edges are skewed slightly towards the center in a way that simply wouldn't happen if the part were flexible and wrapped to the surface.
I've tried overcrown and stretch options with identical results. I can't see how a law function would work in this case, but I'm certainly willing to be corrected.
We're using NX-3. I can't spot any real difference in NX-4 and we haven't installed NX-5 yet.
If anyone knows of a better way to tackle the problem I'd appreciate your suggestion.
Regards
Hudson
P.S.
We know that we can get the desired result if we create sweeps in either direction alternately uniting and subtracting. However this is long winded tedious and the model quickly becomes quite heavy indeed.