DML-PE-LLC
Civil/Environmental
- Jan 17, 2025
- 2
Hi All.
I help with small-scale land development projects (e.g., pools, additions, etc.) in Pennsylvania. We have some of the strictest stormwater regulations here and stormwater design is often a challenge. After doing this for 15+ years and observing real-world conditions, I have come to the conclusion that using the SCS method to model semi-urban runoff for areas less than 20,000 sf is not a great solution. I am curious if anyone has used the Dekalb Method in HydroCAD to model a pre- and post-development peak control comparison. If so, would you be open to sharing the model so I can review it?
Also, please, no need to respond about how the SCS method is more accurate than MRM / Dekalb. I do not need help understanding that.
Thanks,
dml
I help with small-scale land development projects (e.g., pools, additions, etc.) in Pennsylvania. We have some of the strictest stormwater regulations here and stormwater design is often a challenge. After doing this for 15+ years and observing real-world conditions, I have come to the conclusion that using the SCS method to model semi-urban runoff for areas less than 20,000 sf is not a great solution. I am curious if anyone has used the Dekalb Method in HydroCAD to model a pre- and post-development peak control comparison. If so, would you be open to sharing the model so I can review it?
Also, please, no need to respond about how the SCS method is more accurate than MRM / Dekalb. I do not need help understanding that.
Thanks,
dml