MikeManning
Specifier/Regulator
- Dec 4, 2019
- 12
Hi all, I work for a large General Contractor, and one thing that we see a lot is cracks in slabs outside of the contraction joints. We typically get blamed for these cracks, and while the blame is rightfully ours some of the time, there's a decent portion of these issues where we followed the design exactly, sawcut as specified, and still see cracking outside of the joints.
Is this expected in the engineering world?
I tried to educate myself on the design criteria for sawcuts, and it seems like there is some room for variation from the looks of it.
ACI 302.1 says that sawcuts should be at least 1/4 the slab thickness, or 1", whichever is greater, or 1/3 depth in the case of fiber-reinforcement.
That said, I've also heard some projects and engineers specify 1/3 depth regardless of mix.
I found info in ACI 302.1 about the timing of sawcuts (within 4 hours in hot weather, 12 in cold) which is generally in line with our practices.
I found ACI 360 for some criteria on joint spacing, although this same document seems to indicate that there are a lot more factors than simply the slab depth and predicted shrinkage. This is one area where our designs don't seem to be consistent, and many drawing packages don't contain joint spacing. Although, from what I read, this should be the slab designer that specifies joint locations.
What are your experiences?
Any thoughts are appreciated!
Thank you
Is this expected in the engineering world?
I tried to educate myself on the design criteria for sawcuts, and it seems like there is some room for variation from the looks of it.
ACI 302.1 says that sawcuts should be at least 1/4 the slab thickness, or 1", whichever is greater, or 1/3 depth in the case of fiber-reinforcement.
That said, I've also heard some projects and engineers specify 1/3 depth regardless of mix.
I found info in ACI 302.1 about the timing of sawcuts (within 4 hours in hot weather, 12 in cold) which is generally in line with our practices.
I found ACI 360 for some criteria on joint spacing, although this same document seems to indicate that there are a lot more factors than simply the slab depth and predicted shrinkage. This is one area where our designs don't seem to be consistent, and many drawing packages don't contain joint spacing. Although, from what I read, this should be the slab designer that specifies joint locations.
What are your experiences?
Any thoughts are appreciated!
Thank you