Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

DHT (Dehydrogenation Procedure on welds) for Vessel

Status
Not open for further replies.

Saver2008

Mechanical
Oct 14, 2008
112
Hi!

I have the following problem:
1.- I have an horizontal cylindrical vessel with following thicknesses in body and heads and nozzles: 3/4", 1-1/2", 2". Material: SA-516-70 Killed. This equipment will be PWHT performed. The vessel is completely welded (circumferential and longitudinal welds are already done...like 1 month ago).

Client´s specification indicates me the following:
" A) Welded joints greater than 1 1/2 inches (38 mm) in thickness that require PWHT shall be heat treated immediately upon completion of welding. The joint shall not be allowed to cool below 300ºF (150ºC) prior to PWHT. A the weld and adjacent metal may be heated to 600ºF (315ºC), wrapped with insulation, and allowed to cool. PWHT may then be performed later.
B) For welded joints less than or equal to 1½ inches (38 mm) in thickness that require PWHT, the requirements of Paragraph A) are preferred. Alternatively, the joint may be permitted to cool prior to PWHT if the joint is 100 percent radiographed after completion of PWHT. "

Reason to meet paragraph A) and/or B) is due to dehydrogenation process, I mean, to perform a dehydrogenation heat treatment (eliminate residual hydrogen in the weld)

The situation here is when we welded body courses and nozzles, we did not performed the A) and B) paragraphs. We expect that during PWHT on complete body (PWHT will be performed within a furnace), residual hydrogen in the weld dissapears or be eliminated; but we are not sure.

Can you help me if our idea of PWHT can work for an non-realized DHT? What other option do I have?

Thank you very much
Roland
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You've not met the contract specification but you will have met ASME VIII. While the specifcation wording would be applicable when welding a high strength low alloy steel steels like grade 91, it is way overboard for low carbon steels like SA516 70 in the thickness ranges stated. Advise asking your client for a deviation.

I would have definitely taken exception to this requirement with noted cost for compliance.
 
Could not agree more with what weldstan has stated.

The devil is in the details; she also wears prada.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor