KenStructural
Structural
- Jan 26, 2012
- 40
Hi Guys,
May I have your thoughts in my etabs model particularly the diaphragm action of floor plate (rigid diaphragm), assuming the lateral resisting system are the ones along the perimeter of the building and the rest of the frames are for gravity (internal frames). As shown on the attached sketch (Figure 1) is the axial response of the beams opposing the seismic loads whereas Figure 2 is the modified model having internal beams as gravity beams and to idealize the diaphragm action to transmit the seismic/in plane forces to resisting element (collector/drag-strut) and eventually to lateral resisting system what I did is to release the axial resistance (axial stiffness modifier = 0.01) of the internal beam thereby the seismic load is transferred to the outer frame which is the lateral resisting frame. Is figure 2 model is correct or acceptable.
May I have your thoughts in my etabs model particularly the diaphragm action of floor plate (rigid diaphragm), assuming the lateral resisting system are the ones along the perimeter of the building and the rest of the frames are for gravity (internal frames). As shown on the attached sketch (Figure 1) is the axial response of the beams opposing the seismic loads whereas Figure 2 is the modified model having internal beams as gravity beams and to idealize the diaphragm action to transmit the seismic/in plane forces to resisting element (collector/drag-strut) and eventually to lateral resisting system what I did is to release the axial resistance (axial stiffness modifier = 0.01) of the internal beam thereby the seismic load is transferred to the outer frame which is the lateral resisting frame. Is figure 2 model is correct or acceptable.