Ganfoss2
Mechanical
- Oct 23, 2007
- 32
Differential design of tubesheets (P.Shell - P.Channel) allow the reduce in thk of tubesheets.
With a TEMA HIGH PRESSURE Exchanger with a Shell Side flanged and the Channel Side Integral with the Channel Barrels (Welded Joint) as stated in Fig. UHX-12.1(e), the differential design may lead to a sensible tubesheet thickness reduction taking in account the moment due to the Bolt Loads (M = W x hG)?
Assume: P.Shell = 1.50 x P.Channel, same Gaskets Types (m, Y) and Dimensions (diam. G and width N) and PRESSURE CASE (factor "m") govern the design of the Flanged Joint, therefore I have to assure a minimum load on the gasket calculate by: m x P.Shell.
I have to desigh the flanged joint between teh tubesheet and the Shell Barrel for the FULL PRESSURE at SHELL SIDE and not for the DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE (P.Shell-P.Channel) andtehrefore W of Bolt Load is evaluated takingin account the full pressure at shell side!
Is this correct?
Many Thanks to all.
With a TEMA HIGH PRESSURE Exchanger with a Shell Side flanged and the Channel Side Integral with the Channel Barrels (Welded Joint) as stated in Fig. UHX-12.1(e), the differential design may lead to a sensible tubesheet thickness reduction taking in account the moment due to the Bolt Loads (M = W x hG)?
Assume: P.Shell = 1.50 x P.Channel, same Gaskets Types (m, Y) and Dimensions (diam. G and width N) and PRESSURE CASE (factor "m") govern the design of the Flanged Joint, therefore I have to assure a minimum load on the gasket calculate by: m x P.Shell.
I have to desigh the flanged joint between teh tubesheet and the Shell Barrel for the FULL PRESSURE at SHELL SIDE and not for the DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE (P.Shell-P.Channel) andtehrefore W of Bolt Load is evaluated takingin account the full pressure at shell side!
Is this correct?
Many Thanks to all.