Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Disconnection Time Requirments?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mbrooke

Electrical
Nov 12, 2012
2,546
Why do circuits 32 amps and under require a 0.4 second disconnection time at 230 volts, but circuits over 32 amps are legally allowed 5 seconds? 115 volts for 5 seconds is enough to cause injury to the body.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

In which publication did you find these requirements?
 
You are right. I found it my self in 2011 edition. I think it's a mistake. It has to be 0.5 instead of 5.
I think it is based on IEC 60479-1 eventually.
If we compare IEC 60479-1 Fig.20 for 50/60 Hz with Fig.22 for d.c. for 40 mA body current the time limit is 0.2 s for a.c. and 0.5 sec for 45 mA d.c.
 
I'm still getting 5 seconds in IEC 60364-4-41:

Clipboard0101_frfwkj.jpg



You're right though, 5 seconds violates the body graph.
 
For Condition 1 (defined as normally dry situations, where the surface on which the person at risk is standing presents some resistance (to the general mass of earth) and that a person is assumed to have dry or moist skin), the disconnection time could be 5 seconds or greater.
7anoter4 is correct in saying 0.5 seconds for Condition 2 (wet locations) though!
 
I had assumed the limits for small circuits were aimed at protecting end users versus for larger circuit sizes perhaps the requirements aimed more at fire prevention and/or equipment damage prevention while also allowing some coordination with branch circuit protection. The 32 A circuits seem much more likely to have plug/cord connected devices.
 
Could the source impedance and voltage drop have something to do with it? A 32 amp circuit would make the source look strong, and as such the source can be considered infinite- providing all the current needed during a fault without voltage drop. However a fault on a 400 amp circuit would make the source look weak- dropping in voltage as it supplies the current?

@Bacon- but in theory the hazard is still there even for larger circuits and in some cases feeders too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor