KKiiwwii
Electrical
- Mar 18, 2017
- 1
I have fallen heir to what I am sure is a historically, incorrectly installed 11kV suite of OCB switchgear.
An old plant in the 1970’s had installed a suite of Yorkshire ‘So Hi’ OCB’s as a ring main unit. The suite was originally cabled with 3C 125mm2 Cu cables but the cable box for a unit that has now had a cable-termination failure was never filled with compound. I am now convinced from reading the manual, that it should have been. The problem had also been exacerbated with a change-over to a 3C 250mm2 Al cable which meant that far much more bulky terminations were now in the box
My reason for saying this is that the cable box that has failed has, I am sure, the configuration for compound- filling, as I have been able to discover from manuals available on the internet. I am sure that if the failed cable box had been left as it was originally cabled, there was obviously just enough distance in the internal clearances for the box to have ‘squeaked through’ and not undergone an arc-flash event, although it had not been filled, as required, with cable-box compound.
All the other boxes have not had any similar problems to date, but as far as I can determine, they have not been re-cabled either. As the rest of the suite is live I cannot check whether the other boxes are compound-filled and therefore problem-free, or if they are also only-just squeaking through internal clearance requirements.
Can any readers familiar with this older style and now discontinued line of switchgear, please shed light on this matter. Has anybody had any similar experiences with this same style of switchgear, who could share them with me.
An old plant in the 1970’s had installed a suite of Yorkshire ‘So Hi’ OCB’s as a ring main unit. The suite was originally cabled with 3C 125mm2 Cu cables but the cable box for a unit that has now had a cable-termination failure was never filled with compound. I am now convinced from reading the manual, that it should have been. The problem had also been exacerbated with a change-over to a 3C 250mm2 Al cable which meant that far much more bulky terminations were now in the box
My reason for saying this is that the cable box that has failed has, I am sure, the configuration for compound- filling, as I have been able to discover from manuals available on the internet. I am sure that if the failed cable box had been left as it was originally cabled, there was obviously just enough distance in the internal clearances for the box to have ‘squeaked through’ and not undergone an arc-flash event, although it had not been filled, as required, with cable-box compound.
All the other boxes have not had any similar problems to date, but as far as I can determine, they have not been re-cabled either. As the rest of the suite is live I cannot check whether the other boxes are compound-filled and therefore problem-free, or if they are also only-just squeaking through internal clearance requirements.
Can any readers familiar with this older style and now discontinued line of switchgear, please shed light on this matter. Has anybody had any similar experiences with this same style of switchgear, who could share them with me.