passist
Industrial
- Jun 28, 2015
- 3
I am a valve technician, my job is to assemble, and inspect valves.
Most of the valves in the company I work for are quarter turn eg. Ball, V-Ball, butterfly, and a few other ones.
For a while now I've been struggling to understand why the requirements often are somewhat odd.
For example when producing ASME #600, OR ASME #900 valves specially designed for high pressure control applications, a low pressure air test ( 3.5 - 6 barg ) is often required, with extremely tight leakage allowance. ( ANSI VI, API 598 )
Wouldnt it make more sense to order a 100barg water test such as ANSI Class V to match the real situation?
Also valves like V-ball valve, for flow control applications, leakage rates ANSI V, or ISO D are often required. Are this kind of leakage rates really required for a control valve, or do they just want them to be tighter, because nowadays everybody is offering it?
Now how long will it be, that a metal to metal seated valve will hold the ANSI VI rating, or will it soon be an ANSI IV valve when it is being used in the real world outside the testing facility?
Im especially interested in the triple offset butterfly valves, they are marketed as bubble tight, but I find it hard to believe, that the rating would be long-lasting.
Obviously the flow media will have a huge impact on the leakage ratios, but since I have no field experience, id appreciate all possible information regarding valve leakage lifetime.
Most of the valves in the company I work for are quarter turn eg. Ball, V-Ball, butterfly, and a few other ones.
For a while now I've been struggling to understand why the requirements often are somewhat odd.
For example when producing ASME #600, OR ASME #900 valves specially designed for high pressure control applications, a low pressure air test ( 3.5 - 6 barg ) is often required, with extremely tight leakage allowance. ( ANSI VI, API 598 )
Wouldnt it make more sense to order a 100barg water test such as ANSI Class V to match the real situation?
Also valves like V-ball valve, for flow control applications, leakage rates ANSI V, or ISO D are often required. Are this kind of leakage rates really required for a control valve, or do they just want them to be tighter, because nowadays everybody is offering it?
Now how long will it be, that a metal to metal seated valve will hold the ANSI VI rating, or will it soon be an ANSI IV valve when it is being used in the real world outside the testing facility?
Im especially interested in the triple offset butterfly valves, they are marketed as bubble tight, but I find it hard to believe, that the rating would be long-lasting.
Obviously the flow media will have a huge impact on the leakage ratios, but since I have no field experience, id appreciate all possible information regarding valve leakage lifetime.