jtseng123
Mechanical
- Jun 6, 2012
- 530
Dear all,
Div 2, Table 4.4.1 sets the 800 F limit for many commonly used materials for compressive stress, that means I can not use the materials that I used to use if temp is exceeding 800F unless I switch to Div 1.
The compressive stress will occur at design temperature from weight, wind, seismic or vacuum, and not always below 800F. I have a hydrocracker reactor at 2500 psig and 850 F with 2 1/4Cr-1Mo or 2 1/4Cr-1Mo-1/4V. Years ago we built many from Div 2. But due to the temp limit, forcing us to use Div 1, more expensive with thicker wall.
Questions:
Why Div. 1 has no temperature limit ?
Why can't Div 1 and Div 2 come up with the same rules on compressive stress? Metal can not tell it is Div 1 or 2. People was talking about creep or rupture stress, but apparently Div 1 has no concern to set temp limit.
Any code case or interpretation that Div 2 is allowed to be used above 800 F for my reactor ?
Thanks for any of your opinion.
Div 2, Table 4.4.1 sets the 800 F limit for many commonly used materials for compressive stress, that means I can not use the materials that I used to use if temp is exceeding 800F unless I switch to Div 1.
The compressive stress will occur at design temperature from weight, wind, seismic or vacuum, and not always below 800F. I have a hydrocracker reactor at 2500 psig and 850 F with 2 1/4Cr-1Mo or 2 1/4Cr-1Mo-1/4V. Years ago we built many from Div 2. But due to the temp limit, forcing us to use Div 1, more expensive with thicker wall.
Questions:
Why Div. 1 has no temperature limit ?
Why can't Div 1 and Div 2 come up with the same rules on compressive stress? Metal can not tell it is Div 1 or 2. People was talking about creep or rupture stress, but apparently Div 1 has no concern to set temp limit.
Any code case or interpretation that Div 2 is allowed to be used above 800 F for my reactor ?
Thanks for any of your opinion.