jmag03
Structural
- Sep 7, 2023
- 2
I do a lot of load ratings using older plans and often the design loading is "HS20-44" or "HS20-44 with Alternate Military Loading". When I compare versus the bridge inventory it will sometimes include Alternate Military Loading when the plans only specify HS20-44. I know that "44" is the year that AASHTO developed the HS20 loading configuration so maybe military loading was implied during WWII, but my intuition wants to consider the loading as HS20 unless Alternate Military Loading is explicitly stated. Can somebody please clarify this for me?