Does Regulation restrict or improve innovation

[PBroad]

Given that some forum members are tied to a "State Licence" issued by non-engineers, while others are members of "self-regulating bodies". Do members feel that their authorising board encourages them to be innovative and install the "best available (international)technology" even if this has not been used before in their location? Or does it rather demand that they stick to tried and tested methods similar to those Noah used to build the Ark?

 

[PSE]

Off hand, I do not think that regulation restricts innovation. Rather it should set forth some of the minimum or baseline requirements that must be addressed in any design or product.

That said, regulations and standards should also be capable of embracing break-through materials, processes, and other technologies providing that those break-throughs can be shown to meet or exceed the existing requirements.

To expand on your example, a regulation that only allowed for the use of wood in shipbuilding would be in my mind a poor regulation. A standard setting the minimum requirements for seaworthiness would be a "good" standard.

Regards,

 

[ELEcontrol3e]

First off according to the only source for Noah's ark, the original specifications were given by a very capable engineer.

Second, you underestimate the value of wood as an engineering material.
All kidding aside............
I haven't had enough qualifying experience yet to speak for myself, but I would say that it is my impression that PE's are far more innovative, even though they are usually very conscious of the safety and legal impacts of the methods used. This topic would make an interesting sociological/engineering study. I think the old addage necessity is the mother of invention holds true. A PE with the current knowledge of engineer methods, understanding of rudimentary principles, etc. are the best people to solve these problems.

Data could be collected to look at # of patents for PE vs. non,-PE’s depth of experience and impact of patent, entrepreneurship and licensure, etc.

I think this is a good post, I wish more PE's in the forum would respond. I'd be interested to read the responses to this idea.

 

[rajivkrishen]

Of late, most of the regulations have been encouraging innovation. That is, the time since regulating bodies have started realising the full potential of 'globalisation'.

It is appropriate that the bodies are named 'regulating' bodies. Else they would be 'control' bodies which implies restriction, which can be seen in closed economies.

The regulating bodies promote development through most economic (preferable) route. Now, the most economic route encompasses least costs, human and environmental protection and better materials and technolgies. This boosts innovation.

rajeev krishan